What is UF2B?

We are 5 poker heads who are looking to elevate our games through discussion and sweat sessions with one another. This will be where we share our ideas and concepts, as well as report on our own individual growth. Each week, we will concentrate and study one poker concept and write an article on it. Please check back frequently and let us know your thoughts and opinions; we welcome your feedback.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Hand 4: 14th Jan

This week was Dice14 playing four tables of $2/4NL on Full Tilt.

Hand 4

Stack sizes:
SB: $458
Hero: $418.30

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 9d 7h
4 folds, SB raises to $16, Hero calls.

The SB here is a very aggressive regular, so we felt it would be fine to defend with a hand as weak as 97o here.


Flop: 9h 8d 2s ($32, 2 players)
SB bets $20, Hero calls.

This is a good flop for us. We make a very standard call.


Turn: 6h ($72, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

This is a really interesting spot on the turn. The standard line is to check behind this turn and then make a decision on the river (and this is the best line in general). However, we think this turn brings up a really interesting and unusual spot. This is a spot where it would have been a really cool play to bet the turn to induce a bluff raise from our aggressive opponent. If we bet this turn, it looks like we're floating (why would we bet a marginal hand on the turn?), and an aggressive opponent is definitely capable of making a play blind-on-blind. Obviously we're never folding if we bet the turn - it's for value.

River: Ah ($72, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

The river is a standard check behind. I think we would've called a bet as the ace is a really good card for him to represent if he has air.


Results:
Final pot: $72
SB showed 6c 5c
Hero showed 9d 7h

2 comments:

Marc said...

You brought up some good points about why it might be better to bet the turn. I still like a check behind. We have too much showdown value and pot equity right now to really like a checkraise, even if we induce it, IMO. Villain seems capable of putting us on a wide range with position in a blind battle, and while he might bluff-raise, he might also hope that we are floating, figuring there aren't a whole lot of hands that are going to call flop and turn if he's trying to extract.

DODGYKEN said...

Thanks for the comment Mark. I agree that a turn check is the best play here, and I'd normally play it the way Dice did here.

You make a good point at the end. I think what you're saying is that, if villian has a relatively strong hand, he might decide to check-call the turn to extract value from our floats. I think this is a really good point (that I hadn't thought about). I guess what I'd say is if he check-calls the turn we should be more concerned than if he check-raises.